comment 1

The Satisfied Cat Asks: What’s a Snowflake?

“Snowflake” has been a favorite conservative insult for the better part of two years.  Kellyanne Conway uses it.  Sean Hannity uses it.  Mike Huckabee uses it.  Tomi Lahren, Steve Bannon, and Janice Atkinson all love it.  Quite a club.  But where does it come from?

Chuck Palahniuk told The Evening Standard in January that he coined the insult in his book Fight Club.  Mr. Palahniuk presumably refers to this line, which was roughly echoed by Brad Pitt’s character in the movie of the same name: “You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake. You are the same decaying organic matter as everyone, and we are all part of the same compost pile.”

But while Mr. Palahniuk may have popularized snowflake’s current usage, did he actually create the phrase?  As it turns out, not so much.  According to the fine people at Merriam-Webster, the snowflake moniker originated in 1860’s Missouri to describe a person who opposed the abolition of slavery.

In his 1876 book, St. Louis, the Future Great City of the World, L.U. Revais described the nomenclature as follows:

“Those who were the most earnest supporters of Mr. Lincoln, and favored a vigorous prosecution of the war, were denominated ‘Charcoals;’ the conservative Union men, who also favored a gradual system of emancipation, were termed ‘Claybanks;’ while the anti-war and pro-slavery men gloried in the name of ‘Snowflakes.'”

So, to sum up: Today’s white supremacists use a phrase coined to describe nineteenth century white supremacists to denigrate today’s civil rights activists.  That’s some kind of irony.

 

 


 

Addendum 1:  Fight Club, I don’t doubt, is where many a modern-day user first encountered the snowflake slur.  Apropos of nothing, this book centers on powerless and impotent men looking to “destroy something beautiful” in order to validate their own existence.  Make of that what you will.

Addendum 2: L.U. Reavis, cited above for his description of snowflakes, is mostly well known for his fervent and failed attempts at removing the federal capitol from Washington D.C. to St. Louis.  Some of his many books and pamphlets remain available to this day, in case any of you wish further educate yourselves on his cause.

Addendum 3: I neglected to link Steve Bannon in the first paragraph to a snowflake quote.  Please forgive me.  I don’t get paid to write this blog, which means I am insufficiently incentivized to wade through the disgusting morass that is Breitbart.

 

comment 0

Into the Badlands, and the joys of tinkering with someone else’s dialogue.

Ever watch a show and find yourself thinking, “Boy, I wish that dialogue was better,” or, “Hot damn, I was enjoying this film until they opened their mouths,” or even, “That last scene permanently destroyed any positive feeling I had about this series?”  Yeah, me too.  All the time.

Take the following scene from episode 3, season 1 of Into the Badlands, an AMC show that I’m in the process of binge watching on Netflix:

Lydia: Jade, I appreciate it, but you really don’t need to be here.

Jade: Ryder’s going to be my family as well.

Lydia: Do you know why Quinn proposed to you?  You’re a distraction, something to feed his ego, make him feel young again.

Jade: I understand you’re upset, Baroness, but I am not the enemy.

Lydia: Well, if you believe that, then you really haven’t the faintest clue about this life.

Jade:  I’ve been in this house since I was a girl.  I understand more than you think.

Lydia: When your son is lying in front of you, slipping away while you look on, helpless, then you can tell me what you understand.  So a word of advice from one wife to another: A baron’s home isn’t a sanctuary.  It’s a battlefield.

Holy shit, who talks like that?

Well, I hear you say, maybe a better understanding of the backstory would help contextualize this sort of clunky language?  Cut the writers some slack, you say.

Context it is.  I’m only part way into episode 3, but here’s the information I have thus far:

Wars sometime in the distant past launched a dark age, from which emerged a feudal society governed by Barons.  The Barons have stripped people of their guns (yay!), and forced the frightened and impoverished into indentured servitude (boo!).  Everyone still fights all the time, but now they do it with swords, knives, and sweet, sweet kung-fu moves (…yay?).  The series is presumably set in a post-apocalyptic United States.  I say “presumably” because, while they never specify, the foliage is lush, the principal Baron lives in a house that looks suspiciously like the Evergreen Plantation in Louisiana, and everyone glows with the fine sheen of southern humidity.  It sure as hell isn’t Wyoming.

In the scene above, Lydia, the Baron’s first wife, chats up Jade, the soon-to-be second (third? fourth?) wife at the sick bed of Lydia’s son Ryder.  Added plot twist: Jade has been schtupping Ryder behind the scenes.

There.  You’re all caught up.  Whatcha think?  I know I think I still can’t with this dialogue.  Badlands writers, honest question: Did you all sit around the table and read this out loud to one another and honestly say, “Totally sounds like people?”

Or maybe they were you going for a Deadwood thing, to keep with the show’s sort-of-western vibe?  Deadwood, as I recall, had some kickass stylized language.  But if we’re trending that way, why not go big or go home, and whip out some truly hardcore iambic pentameter?

Lydia: As much as I appreciate your skill
with seeming smiles and pleasing countenance
you should but know that I am too well versed
in platitudes to mistake shadow words
for grieving flesh.  I beg you do not dwell
on my account.

Jade: A mother’s grief casts into harsh relief
all suffering beyond itself, the blaze
of its despair reducing mountain peaks
to silhouette.  So too am I reduced.
For now.  Do not forget, howe’er, that soon
my vigil claim will of a mother’s be,
when all that once was only yours is also mine.

Lydia: In marrying, you call upon yourself
your own decay.  My husband does not love
beyond the glass.  His is but mirror love,
all luster and reflection.

Jade: I am no enemy to you.

Lydia: If this is truly what you think, you are
the greater fool.

Jade:  Perhaps I am.  Yet still I stand, a girl
beneath the interest of a Baroness
no more, for I have lived this shadow life
for my entire own, beneath your roof,
and still I stand, and understand, beyond
what you may think.

Lydia: Do not confuse your youth with wisdom earned
or marriage beds for motherhood. This is
my battlefield and you are but a pawn
upon it.

And then hire a bunch of actors who can make bad iambic pentameter sing.  It’s hardly Shakespeare, after all.

In the meantime (and I’m no writer here, so hey, what do I know?) how about cutting these poor actors some slack?  The situation – a feudal, kung fu centric, dystopian society set in the deep south – would be a tough sell even for Anthony Hopkins (although man, was he great in Westworld or what?).  Maybe they’d have an easier time with it if the language wasn’t so stiff.

Lydia: Jade, get the fuck out of here, before I call in my guy with the swords.

Jade: Okey doke.

Too folksy?  Fine.

Lydia: My son is dying.  This isn’t the time or place.

Jade: I know you’re upset, Baroness.  I just thought, now that we’re family, if there’s anything I can do…

Lydia: Marrying my husband doesn’t make you family.

Jade: I know it must hurt you that he wants to marry me.

Lydia: He doesn’t want to marry you.  He wants to be twenty again.  Do you know how many girls he’s had, just like you?  Probably about as many as he’ll have after you’re gone.  What do you think ended up happening to them?

Jade: I’ve lived here my whole life.  I know what I’m doing.

Lydia: Do you?  Do you really?

Jade: Please, just for today, let’s try to set aside our differences for the sake of our son.  I know a doctor…

Lydia:  Marrying my husband doesn’t make you my son’s mother.    Get the hell out of my sight.

Still pretty silly , but at least they don’t sound like they’re reading from Bulwer-Lytton contest entries.  At least (I flatter myself) not as much as they did before.

In all seriousness, I kid because I care.  This is a fun little show, with awesome fight scenes, and an engaging storyline.  Yeah, it’s got hackneyed dialogue.  You can’t ask for everything.

Still, I’m going to leave you with this particularly awesome nugget from later in the episode:

“You know I’m a lot more persuasive when I get what I want.”

As the person watching this with me said, “What the fuck does that even mean?”  Indeed, Badlands.  Indeed.

Dear Mr. Z

Dear Mr. Z,

My cousin has a Facebook friend who I like to call “Crazy Mississippi Dog Lady” in offline conversation.  Crazy Mississippi Dog Lady is a schnauzer breeder in Mississippi.  She likes to spout off on political posts, all political posts, even political posts that aren’t really political posts at all.  Were my cousin, for example, to post  “Can’t We All Get Along?” in a fancy font against a black background, Crazy Mississippi Dog Lady would almost assuredly stop by with choice words about libtards and Obummer and Killary.

In fact, Crazy Mississippi Dog Lady is so vocal, I sort of start to feel like I know her.  I know, for example, that she likes Infowars, and country music, and Fox News.  She appreciated Ancient Aliens and the New World Order (apparently available on Amazon). She has an ongoing feud with another schnauzer breeder in Nevada.  She believes in Jesus’s mercy.  She wants Jerry Brown to rot in hell.  She thinks “antifa” are responsible for the Las Vegas shooting.

And then there’s the way she talks online which, I will admit, shapes the way I imagine her.  She likes to capitalize entire words or even sentences for emphasis.  She loves exclamation points, especially if they come in sets of three to five.  In my mind, she gesticulates wildly while she talks, but I don’t know.  I’ve never actually met her.  I do know that Crazy Mississippi Dog Lady misspells 40% of her words.  She substitutes “u” for “you”, and has not, to my knowledge, ever used the correct version of “your” in an online discussion.  She thinks alt-right soundbites are mic drops.  Next to Cousin Jimmy (another friend’s Facebook-vocal relative from Texas), Crazy Mississippi Dog Lady is my most reliable source for of-the-moment nationalistic jingo.

But the thing I know most solidly about Crazy Mississippi Dog Lady, is that she hates a lot of things.  She hates liberals.  She hates people who utilize government services.  She hates minorities.  She hates immigrants.  She hates people who disagree with her. She really, really hates former president Obama.   All of Crazy Mississippi Dog Lady’s threads ultimately devolve into a Barrack Obama screed.  She particularly likes to belittle his physical appearance, reserving her strongest vitriol for his big ears and his face, which she decrees ugly.  It would not be such a stretch to suppose, although I’m sure Crazy Mississippi Dog Lady would deny it (loudly, with many capital letters, exclamation points and reflexive accusations of bias), that the constant harping on ears and faces is a substitute for the unattractive racial slurs she might be inclined to use in her home but knows enough to avoid memorializing in print.

In short, Crazy Mississippi Dog Lady is a caricature of what a Californian like me imagines a white Mississippian to be.

Today, scrolling through my feed, I came across a re-post from my cousin.  It was a gofundme for Crazy Mississippi Dog Lady.  According to the gofundme, Crazy Mississippi Dog Lady has cancer.  She does not have health insurance.  A two-time cancer survivor, it now seems that one of those previous cancers has metastasized to her lungs.  For those of you who have had the very good fortune to never meet cancer staging in your travels, this spread beyond primary site does not auger well.  Its treatment will certainly be exorbitantly expensive.  In order to conclusively diagnose the cancer, Crazy Mississippi Dog Lady needs a lung biopsy, which the hospital will not provide unless she pays up front.  The initial test, the one Crazy Mississippi Dog Lady’s gofundme is designed to address, costs $25,000, and will likely reveal a need for much more profound and expensive treatment in the coming months.

I find that there’s something deeply upsetting and moving  about Crazy Mississippi Dog Lady’s plight, in the way that Oedipus’s discovery of his fate is both upsetting and moving, or Willie Loman’s delusions are both upsetting and moving.  I have no idea why she does not have insurance.  Perhaps she cannot afford the premiums, influenced as they are by the market destabilization she has so championed with her vote.  Perhaps she hates Obama so much she would not accept the healthcare with his name on it.  Perhaps the healthcare available to her is prohibitively difficult or expensive to acquire in Mississippi, due to the efforts of the Republican politicians she helped elect.  Perhaps she simply would not accept government subsidized healthcare out of pride, because after all, she has been railing against all of those deadbeat takers for years.  Whatever the reason, Crazy Mississippi Dog Lady has now been reduced to begging for money from her friends, after years of virulence and judgment towards those who seek help.  There’s some hypocrisy there, I think.

And yet, for all of that, she is dying.  Her gofundme talks about her dedication to her business, her love of her dogs, her passion for doggie DNA testing.  By the time this is all said and done, she will likely die in extreme poverty, losing even her beloved dogs to the overwhelming medical bills that will postpone her death but not rewrite it.  As I type this, I think how insensitive it is to call her Crazy Mississippi Dog Lady at all. It’s not like I don’t know her name.  It’s Diane.

I think I can say, without being disingenuous, that I can find enough humanity within myself to feel sadness for this dying human in Mississippi who I’ve never met, but feel strangely like I know, who loves her dogs, and her kennel, and her husband, who has enough friends that she has raised $7000 from 40 donations.  That’s 40 people who care.  40 people who will miss her.  40 people who will remember her, for a time.  40 people who perhaps will love her dogs for her when she is gone.

Still.  Still.  I struggle with how to feel about the thing.  I suspect that were our situations reversed, this same woman who I am striving to look upon with compassion would have no similar compassion for me.  If her online presence is any indication, she would delight in my ruin, and exult in my death.  I think of those people at the Charleston church shooting, who watched their friends, relatives and pastor die during a prayer meeting at the hand of a white supremacist, showing up at court to grant a genuine Christian forgiveness to the most undeserving and unrepentant of recipients.  That is humanity at its most aspirational.  I am not a Christian.  I feel no particular guilt or dogma encouraging me to forgive for the sake of forgiveness.  I aspire, nonetheless, to be the sort of human that forgives other humans.

If I am being honest, though, my own feelings are neither as charitable nor admirable as I would wish them to be.  Although I have no idea why Diane has no health insurance, I do know she politically opposed affordable healthcare, and condemns those who accept it.  Perhaps she would rather die than have health insurance provided by a Democrat, or Obama, or a Black man.  That’s bizarre, but her prerogative.  But she has also fought to keep other people from the healthcare she so disparages, people who have no such compunction accepting help from a Democrat, or Obama, or a Black man.  Those other people will suffer and die for her beliefs.  As much as I try to remember those church goers in South Carolina, I still find I have trouble forgiving her for that.  I still blame a dying woman for that.

And then, I think, where does the blame really lie?  Is it with the cancer ridden schnauzer breeder in Mississippi, who screams, shrill and desperate and angry, into the desolate void of cyberspace?  Or does the blame lie elsewhere?  Is it with the people who convinced this lady in Mississippi that their small government stance is something she should die for?  Or is it with the Republican Party, who have for decades castigated the impoverished and the ill for the failing of being impoverished and ill, so much so that this schnauzer breeder would rather die than admit to her politicians that she is impoverished and ill herself?   Is it the president, who promised her a greatness entirely illusory if she will just suffer awhile longer?  Is it Rupert Murdoch and Fox News and Sean Hannity and the Mercers, who lectured her for all these years on the evils of government assistance, and taxes, and compromise?  Or is it the religion of her childhood, of her town, of all of her friends, a religion that advocates faith and subservience over information and reason?  I don’t know.  I guess there’s plenty of blame to go around.

In the end, I can’t help but wonder whether this lady in Mississippi is, on some level, dying of shame.  I can find it in myself to acknowledge the pathos in that, even if I can’t, to my own shame, forgive her for demanding, with her dying breaths, that other people do the same.

Why, you might be asking, am I telling you about all of this?  I guess because I hope one day you will be a better person than Diane, and a better person than me.  Little people, I notice, are not naturally nice or kind.  They push and shove.  They say mean things.  They hit when they are angry, and howl when they are denied.  Sometimes, I think that this is what humans are.  We are not nice.  We are not kind.  We are territorial, and violent, and unforgiving, and ugly.  We learn to hide it better, but we do not become better.  But still, and I strongly feel this, we must nonetheless try, somehow, to be greater than we are.  This too, is part of being human, the better part.

I am, in this regard, a very average, unremarkable human.  I am still angry at those who slight me, unforgiving of those who I feel threaten me, condemnatory of people who do not see the world as I do.   I worry, sometimes, about whether I can teach you anything at all about being gentle with the world, when I, so clearly, am neither kind nor forgiving myself.  I know, after all this, I won’t stop calling Diane “Crazy Mississippi Dog Lady.”  The best I will likely muster is to say “Crazy Mississippi Dog Lady” with slightly less disdain, or maybe with a little bit more compassion.  I don’t know.  That’s a pretty low bar, and yet a part of me suspects I won’t be able to clear it.

Still, I hope.  I hope, in the face of all evidence to the contrary, I will one day do better.  More importantly, I hope that, one day, maybe you will do better than I have done.  I talk to you all the time, about being considerate to others.  Think about Adam’s feelings before you say that thing.  Be gentle with the dog, even if she ate your toy.  Do these things make a difference?  I don’t know.  Sometimes, when I see you push that obnoxious kid at soccer, or hear you call that annoying boy at school a name, I think maybe not.  Other times, you say something cruel to me, and when I tell you it was hurtful, your little face crumples, and you say, “I’m so sorry.  I didn’t mean to make you feel bad.”  And then you give me a hug, and the hurt is forgotten, and I think, for a moment, that there is hope for all of us after all.  We just have to be a little better than we are today.  Just a very little bit.

-R.

Postscript: Names, locations, and some details have been changed to protect identities.

 

comment 0

On the Importance of Teamwork

Me: Little Dog, what are you doing?

Little Dog: Chewing on the wood floor.  Maybe.  I might be doing that.

Me: But why?

Little Dog: Seems like a fun thing to do.  I dunno.

Me: Stop it.

Little Dog: Or I could be chewing on a peach pit.  You know, those moldy ones I find on the tree in the backyard that give me the runs.  Hard to say.

Me: Gross.

Little Dog: So good.

Me: Look, Little Dog.  You literally own dozens of bones.  They are all over the living room.  I stepped on one getting out of the shower, which I don’t even know what that’s about because you’re scared of the bathroom.  Chew on a dog bone.

Little Dog:  Yeah, but they don’t give me the runs, so…

Me: Wait, what are you doing?

Little Dog: Chewing on the dog bed.  Maybe.  I might be doing that.

Me: You mean, that thing the other dog stashes dog bones in.

Little Dog: Or it could be a sock.

Me: Dude.

Little Dog: I’m dog bone adjacent.

Me: You’re the reason we can’t have nice things.

Little Dog: You know that dent in your laptop?  The child knocked it off the desk when he was running away from me.

Me: What?

Little Dog: It’s a joint effort is all I’m saying.

comment 0

On the Questionable Importance of Always Telling Your Child the Truth

September, 2016:

Z: How’s the world going to end?

J: Well, the sun will probably turn into a red giant and engulf us.

Z: What?

J: Although there’s lots of other thing that could happen – man made disasters, or a meteor could hit the earth. That would wipe us out. The earth would still be here, though, so it wouldn’t really be the end of the world.

Z starts to cry.

Me: J, you’re freaking the kid out.

J: It’s okay, buddy.

Z: I don’t want the world to end!

J: Don’t worry. We’ll all be long gone when it happens.

Z: THE WORLD IS NOT GOING TO END!

J: I don’t know how to handle this.

Me: By the time it happens we’ll have spaceships to fly to another planet.

J: Spaceships are cool, right?

Z: Noooooooooo!

J: Fine. The world isn’t going to end. Ever.

You heard it here first, kids.

20150515-DSC_0710

Dublin, 2015.  Bubbles are cool.  Big bubbles are more cool.